Vote to Upgrade 3515 Lighting: Difference between revisions
From Pumping Station One
Created page with "== Sponsors == Michael Skilton == History == * Mailing List Announcement: * Officially Proposed: * Voted on: ** Quorum: ** Yes: ** No: ** Abstain: ** Discarded due to inv..." |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
The lighting on the 3515 side is poor. We received | The lighting on the 3515 side is poor. We received a lighting assessment from Ener-Light as part of ComEd's energy efficiency rebate program. | ||
As a condition of the lease, the landlord has agreed to "repair or replace" the non-working existing fluorescent fixtures. This likely leaves us with a bunch of old and inefficient lights. | As a condition of the lease, the landlord has agreed to "repair or replace" the non-working existing fluorescent fixtures. This likely leaves us with a bunch of old and inefficient lights. | ||
The landlord has agreed to chip in up to $1000, there are conditions. | The landlord has agreed to chip in up to $1000, there are conditions. | ||
The | The Ener-light proposal has a energy savings pay back time of | ||
We need to authorize the full amount so we can be sure we can fulfill the contract terms regardless of what the landlord actually does or doesn't do. | We need to authorize the full amount so we can be sure we can fulfill the contract terms regardless of what the landlord actually does or doesn't do. | ||
== Language == | == Language == | ||
We authorize the board engage in a contract with Ener-Light and to spend up | We authorize the board engage in a contract with Ener-Light and to spend up $2900 to upgrade the lighting in the 3515 N. Elston portion of the building. | ||
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
