Talk:Vote on 3 Policy Labels: Difference between revisions
From Pumping Station One
| Line 227: | Line 227: | ||
::: Ideally true, but they where violated and interpreted incorrectly thus the need for this vote. --[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 09:22, 7 May 2015 (CDT) | ::: Ideally true, but they where violated and interpreted incorrectly thus the need for this vote. --[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 09:22, 7 May 2015 (CDT) | ||
:::: 1) you are begging the question that the bylaws were violated and interpreted incorrectly. 2) If I consider the case that your points are true, It still seems frivolous to me. I'm not going to vote on something just to clarify bylaws. I object to adding more bureaucracy. --[[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 09:30, 7 May 2015 (CDT) | :::: 1) you are begging the question that the bylaws were violated and interpreted incorrectly. 2) If I consider the case that your points are true, It still seems frivolous to me. I'm not going to vote on something just to clarify bylaws. I object to adding more bureaucracy. --[[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 09:30, 7 May 2015 (CDT) | ||
: The version of the vote created a conflict of the bylaws. At the time my intention was to rework the vote to be a clear amendment to the bylaws. However in the course of editing and attempting to find a more agreeable solution, the parts necessitating a bylaw modification have been removed. --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 21:16, 7 May 2015 (CDT) | |||
