Talk:Vote to Refresh PS:One Server Hardware: Difference between revisions

From Pumping Station One
Kuroishi (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Wikibot (talk | contribs)
m Bot: Cosmetic changes
 
Line 15: Line 15:
:WOW, I had a look, how was a 16 port even supposed to make a dent! --[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 09:16, 20 February 2015 (CST)
:WOW, I had a look, how was a 16 port even supposed to make a dent! --[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 09:16, 20 February 2015 (CST)


Regarding switch ports, I updated the prices to reflect a 24port model of the same switch. We have lots of other 24 port switches around the space which can be better utilized with some planning. We don't really need to be terminating connections for the whole space at the rack, just the rack infrastructure. The idea is to lower the power consumption in the rack itself, we can run other switches around the space. [[User:Kuroishi|Kuroishi]] ([[User talk:Kuroishi|talk]]) 22:58, 17 March 2015 (CDT)
Regarding switch ports, I updated the prices to reflect a 24port model of the same switch. We have lots of other 24 port switches around the space which can be better utilized with some planning. We don't really need to be terminating connections for the whole space at the rack, just the rack infrastructure. The idea is to lower the power consumption in the rack itself, we can run other switches around the space. [[User:Kuroishi|Kuroishi]] ([[User talk:Kuroishi|talk]]) 22:58, 17 March 2015 (CDT)


: Well, if we are trying to save electricity a switch powered on 24/7 for 3 connections seems like a waste.--[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 11:19, 18 March 2015 (CDT)
: Well, if we are trying to save electricity a switch powered on 24/7 for 3 connections seems like a waste.--[[User:Lucas|Lucas]] ([[User talk:Lucas|talk]]) 11:19, 18 March 2015 (CDT)