Vote on 3 Policy Labels: Difference between revisions

From Pumping Station One
Line 6: Line 6:
== History ==
== History ==


* 2015-05-22 - WIP
* 2015-04-22 - Inception
* 2015-06-03 - Discussion (planned)
* 2015-04-29 - Discussion (planned)
* 2015-06-10 - Language Lockdown (planned)
* 2015-05-06 - Language Lockdown (planned)
* 2015-06-16 - Vote (planned)
* 2015-05-13 - Vote (planned)


== Background ==
== Background ==

Revision as of 08:28, 22 April 2015

Sponsors

  • hef

History

  • 2015-04-22 - Inception
  • 2015-04-29 - Discussion (planned)
  • 2015-05-06 - Language Lockdown (planned)
  • 2015-05-13 - Vote (planned)

Background

It's my opinion that the following three pseudo policies are invalid because they were not voted on by the general membership:

While the validity of the above pseudo policies may be debated forever, this vote is to settle the fact.

The purpose of this vote is to reiterate that policy changes in the space must go through a vote of the membership, and policies outside of legal compliance must go through a vote of the membership.

Language

Policy changes in the space are not suitable as a vote of the directors, and must be voted on by the general membership.