Member Rewards Amendment: Difference between revisions

From Pumping Station One
KathyW (talk | contribs)
KathyW (talk | contribs)
Line 42: Line 42:
https://groups.google.com/group/pumping-station-one/msg/7c07bad7a1b41c57
https://groups.google.com/group/pumping-station-one/msg/7c07bad7a1b41c57


This seems to be another change to the schedule of Member Rewards as well as a change to the bylaws themselves setting the value of member rewards.  With respect to value of member rewards, at the time the original Member Rewards amendment was passed, dues were Full=$50 and Starving=$30.  Under the rule in the original amendment that meant that points were worth $20.  ($50-$30= $20 and $20 is not more than $30-$10.)
This seems to be another change to the schedule of Member Rewards, described in part as change to the bylaws themselves setting the value of member rewards to scale with the change in the difference between starving and full member status.  With respect to value of member rewards, at the time the original Member Rewards amendment was passed, dues were Full=$50 and Starving=$30.  Under the rule in the original amendment that meant that points were 'worth' $20.  ($50-$30= $20 and $20 is not more than $30-$10.)


By the time this vote was taken dues were Full=$70 and Staving=$40.  Under the rule in the original amendment that meant that points were worth $30 at that time ($70-$40=$30 and $30 is not more than $30-$10.)
By the time this vote was taken dues were Full=$70 and Staving=$40.  Under the rule in the original amendment that meant that points were worth $30 at that time ($70-$40=$30 and $30 is not more than $30-$10.)