Talk:Childcare: Difference between revisions
From Pumping Station One
m Bot: Cosmetic changes |
→The Lounge: asking if hef has contacted anyone to evaluate the lounge, also noting the transportation post |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
The most likely candidate would be the lounge. It's probably going to take come childproofing. Nearby commercial providers are being considered, as well as the possibility of renting additional commercial space from nearby business. The cost on this would be substantially higher. --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 23:40, 16 June 2015 (CDT) | The most likely candidate would be the lounge. It's probably going to take come childproofing. Nearby commercial providers are being considered, as well as the possibility of renting additional commercial space from nearby business. The cost on this would be substantially higher. --[[User:Hef|Hef]] ([[User talk:Hef|talk]]) 23:40, 16 June 2015 (CDT) | ||
:: Hef, have you contacted any provider to have them evaluate the lounge as a place? If they veto it, then our building is no go. [[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 16:47, 20 July 2015 (CDT) | |||
I would strongly support having babysitting available but at a nearby location that's not PS1. It doesn't seem like PS1 is the ideal location for a childcare room. --[[User:Sylphiae|Sylphiae]] ([[User talk:Sylphiae|talk]]) 13:20, 17 June 2015 (CDT) | I would strongly support having babysitting available but at a nearby location that's not PS1. It doesn't seem like PS1 is the ideal location for a childcare room. --[[User:Sylphiae|Sylphiae]] ([[User talk:Sylphiae|talk]]) 13:20, 17 June 2015 (CDT) | ||
:: There is a good cost/benefit analysis about location and transportation in the thread on the mailing list, and that should be taken in to consideration if anyone follows through. [[User:Skm|Skm]] ([[User talk:Skm|talk]]) 16:47, 20 July 2015 (CDT) | |||
== Child Proofing == | == Child Proofing == | ||
