Talk:Vote on 3 Policy Labels: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

@@ Line 285: / Line 285: @@
 considering the rather unfortunate amount of personal anger involved in the mailing list discussions, I have been pursing one on one discussions, and small group discussions where and when possible.
-Loans: would be ok with a different name, so long as the name carried appropriate impact. Believes the idea of a policy, board voted policy, and member voted policy is nebulous and that is a root cause of the current dispute.
+* Loans: would be ok with a different name, so long as the name carried appropriate impact. Believes the idea of a policy, board voted policy, and member voted policy is nebulous and that is a root cause of the current dispute.
-Sevin: A name other than board voted policy would be better.
+* Sevin: A name other than board voted policy would be better.
-Ray:   unknown, hasn't weighed in from what I can tell, but is decidedly not concerned with board member burnout, and doesn't feel the membership is out of control.
+* Ray:   unknown, hasn't weighed in from what I can tell, but is decidedly not concerned with board member burnout, and doesn't feel the membership is out of control.
-Ryan:  Ryan's opinions are complicated and varied to describe.  I believe he sees this as a power struggle between the board members and non board members.  It is clear that he feels the board needed to vote in these 3 policies, and fears that the membership might vote against if given the opportunity.
+* Ryan:  Ryan's opinions are complicated and varied to describe.  I believe he sees this as a power struggle between the board members and non board members.  It is clear that he feels the board needed to vote in these 3 policies, and fears that the membership might vote against if given the opportunity.
-Tom:   believes that the 3 policies need to exist in order to ensure insurance compliance.  believes that the board was right to vote them in.
+* Tom:   believes that the 3 policies need to exist in order to ensure insurance compliance.  believes that the board was right to vote them in.
-Skay:  Believes the 3 policies didn't need to be voted on, as they would already be in effect, and that the only thing that was required is that the membership be informed.
+* Skay:  Believes the 3 policies didn't need to be voted on, as they would already be in effect, and that the only thing that was required is that the membership be informed.
-Jenny:  unknown, hasn't weighed in from what I can tell.
+* Jenny:  unknown, hasn't weighed in from what I can tell.
-Kuroishi:  Was not present for the vote, I think he feels that the policy votes were not necessary, but I am less certain of his opinion.
+* Kuroishi:  Was not present for the vote, I think he feels that the policy votes were not necessary, but I am less certain of his opinion.
-Justin:  Interested in ensuring the org is member run
+* Justin:  Interested in ensuring the org is member run
-Carl: Interested in ensuring that participation in policy making is not a hard requirement
+* Carl: Interested in ensuring that participation in policy making is not a hard requirement
-Jason:  He wanted to talk to me, but we managed to miss each other. Seems interested in no one making polices that are summarized as "we will obey the law"
+* Jason:  He wanted to talk to me, but we managed to miss each other. Seems interested in no one making polices that are summarized as "we will obey the law"
-Elizabeth:  I havn't talked to her in person, she seems interested in no one accusing the board of wrongdoing.
+* Elizabeth:  I havn't talked to her in person, but she seems interested in no one accusing the board of wrongdoing.
 The people I haven't talked to that I should: