Talk:Vote on 3 Policy Labels: Difference between revisions
From Pumping Station One
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
:It does a lot of good for the space. The ultimate stakeholders of Pumping Station: One, NFP are the members. As such, the members decide the direction of the organization. If you think that the voting process is a "cost" and is "annoying", then you should probably make yourself a non-voting member. Those of us who actually have an interest in the running of the space want to vote on things. --[[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 10:47, 5 May 2015 (CDT) | :It does a lot of good for the space. The ultimate stakeholders of Pumping Station: One, NFP are the members. As such, the members decide the direction of the organization. If you think that the voting process is a "cost" and is "annoying", then you should probably make yourself a non-voting member. Those of us who actually have an interest in the running of the space want to vote on things. --[[User:Justin|Justin]] ([[User talk:Justin|talk]]) 10:47, 5 May 2015 (CDT) | ||
::Some votes necessitated by the policy will be nonsense or inappropriate for the rabble to vote on in the first place. So yes, there can be a cost and pointless votes can be annoying. [[User:Jason|Jason]] ([[User talk:Jason|talk]]) 12:58, 7 May 2015 (CDT) | |||
(bare with the 2 levels of voting here. We are voting on how to vote, so the word vote doesn't always reference the same thing.) | (bare with the 2 levels of voting here. We are voting on how to vote, so the word vote doesn't always reference the same thing.) | ||
